MuteDebt Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 (edited) I looked up the lawyer representing one of the collections agencies and discovered that he also works for a lawyer that fights bad collections agencies this doesn't make sense to me. Could somebody please explain this?Ryan Vos works for Cach and Mandarich Law Group and this guy as well!Fair Debt Collection - California Lawyer: New casesSee My firm defends collection lawsuit brought by Palisades Collection and Wolpoff & AbramsonI'm very confused does anybody else know about this? Edited October 30, 2012 by MuteDebt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Public Enemy Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I suppose it is like a realtor who sometimes represents the buyer and sometimes the seller. He gets paid either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuteDebt Posted October 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Why is this thread showing it's locked? Now I'm really confused. I guess it just doesn't seem right to me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomnTex Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Doesn't seem locked to me....I posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltfan1972 Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I'd like that !! If I was ever charged with a serious criminal offense, I'd love to have a defense attorney that used to prosecute people that were alleged to have done what I was charged with. Most prosecutors were defense attorney's and/or when they stop prosecuting they go to criminal defense. Why? Because they know it all. When I worked insurance claims I hated going to a body shop where a former adjuster now worked. Why? because I knew they knew all the insurance b.s. and what they could and could not get away with. They knew what my arguments would be and what would shoot them down because they had been their done that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antiquedave Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 We have one in Michigan that works both sides of the street as well, surprised me the first time I realized it.If it works for you it works I guess but it is not the firm I use. the michigan guy does have an interesting blog though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nascar Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I looked up the lawyer representing one of the collections agencies and discovered that he also works for a lawyer that fights bad collections agencies this doesn't make sense to me. Could somebody please explain this?Ryan Vos works for Cach and Mandarich Law Group and this guy as well!Fair Debt Collection - California Lawyer: New casesSee My firm defends collection lawsuit brought by Palisades Collection and Wolpoff & AbramsonI'm very confused does anybody else know about this?Read that again. You misread. In any event, your source is 6 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltfan1972 Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Read that again. You misread. In any event, your source is 6 years old.Exactly !! It says this, "Consumer advocate and credit/debt expert Bud Hibbs names Asset Acceptance the 8th worst debt collection agency in the country."We all know that Asset Acceptance is in the top three of the worst here in 2012. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calawyer Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I looked up the lawyer representing one of the collections agencies and discovered that he also works for a lawyer that fights bad collections agencies this doesn't make sense to me. Could somebody please explain this?Ryan Vos works for Cach and Mandarich Law Group and this guy as well!Fair Debt Collection - California Lawyer: New casesSee My firm defends collection lawsuit brought by Palisades Collection and Wolpoff & AbramsonI'm very confused does anybody else know about this?THe article is saying that Vos works for Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP, attorneys for the debt collector. NACA lawyers do not represent debt collectors. Said another way, if someone is representing a debt collector, they cannot be a NACA member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antiquedave Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I am announcing the formation of Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers and its new blog | Michigan Collection Law Bloghe says he represents both sides but did not see his name on the NACA site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladyhunter Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 It's business, pure and simple. Money is the bottom line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calawyer Posted October 30, 2012 Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 I am announcing the formation of Michigan Consumer Credit Lawyers and its new blog | Michigan Collection Law Bloghe says he represents both sides but did not see his name on the NACA siteRepresenting debt collectors disqualifies him from being a NACA member. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuteDebt Posted October 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 30, 2012 Thanks for clarifying, it was late at night when I read it and it made me really upset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts