Jump to content

Plaintiff used whiteout to edit interrogatories?


roadkill
 Share

Recommended Posts

Interrogatories as sent

 

7.        Please state the total number of affidavits signed by Perdi ackson Boy on 4/6/2012 (Relevance Robo-signing).

 

 

Plantiffs replied with

 

 

7.        Please state the total number of affidavits signed by Perdi ackson Boy on 4/6/2012 Blob of whiteout

 

RESPONSE:  Plaintiff objects to this Interrogatory on the basis of relevance and the fact that it would not lead to the admission of any relevant admissible evidence.

 

 

Can I burn them with this and to what extent?

 

 

Background

Who CAV PORT

Amount  8,000

At the Meet and Confer/Motion to Compel stage.

They got nothing so far, an affidavit and 3 (Tried to get me to authenticate) statements.

 

Longtime lurker who really appreciates what you guys and gals do here.

 

 

 

      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you file a copy of your original 'rogs with the Court?  If so, then the Court will see that it was whited-out. 

 

 

 

edit - to expand on it a bit, I don't think you even needed to make mention of the "relevance - robosigning" in your 'rogs...but since you did, and they then whited out and said "not relevant", i think you have at least evidence of shady behaviours, if nothing else.  I'd prepare to Subpoena the perdi Ackson Boy character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.