whatamess2

Plaintiff's Exhibit refers to another document/Exhibit that wasn't included

Recommended Posts

I read this post on the forum about a state that has a rule that says they have to provide the document.

 

DEFENDANT’S DEMAND FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO R. 4:18-2

Pursuant to Rule 4:18-2, Defendant hereby demands that Plaintiff serve copies of the following documents cited in the complaint within 5 days after service of this request as prescribed by the Rules of Court.
1. “an agreement” in Plaintiff’s Complaint statement #2
 

Does anyone know if there is such a rule/law in Oregon? I did a search and read UTCR Chapter 2 and don't see anything.

 

I had previously requested these documents and many more that they evaded and finally produced the 1 page Bill of Sale which doesn't prove anything when they had to provide their Pre-Hearing Statement of Proof.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated!

Thanks!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in the same situation. JDB's affadvit refers to an account statement and yet no account statement was included.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.