faith316 Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Served by sheriff by collection firm, stated 30 day window respond. Was already completing application with debt management firm (they were rec by suze orman). Advised by them not to worry, don't have to goto court and can set aside pprwrk b/c they wld negotiate with Amex. Sooooo...Amex rejects proposal b/c it is in the hands of atty. Money management company contacts atty to arrange payment plan. Atty says 25 percent upfront and then will talk about payment plan but will only negotiate with me. Atty has been calling everyday! Balance $13000Last pymnt approx 1&1/2 yrs ago***Feel worn out.-have medical bills for both of my toddlers and I am paying their daycare, healthcare by myself to the tune of $1500 mnth. That is why I became so very much behind. PLEASE help me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwheelock915 Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 @faith316 aaaaand that is why many people here are do not like debt management/consolidation companies. When was your 30 days up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kutuzov Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Yes when you where served? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faith316 Posted August 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 I was served 4/27/13 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwheelock915 Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 @faith316 Have you spoken with legal aid? You seem like you woud be a good candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kutuzov Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 Did they filed a default with the court already? since you are way over the 30 days to respond to the lawsuit they could/probably did file a motion for default by clerk. Also that's not yet a judgement, in Florida after they get the default they need to file another motion for a Final Judgement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faith316 Posted August 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 If they did , I have not been made aware. I checked out the legal aid site and they might make allowances for childcare. If not, I won'tqualify. Any other advice? Should I contact the attorney and attempt a settlement? Returning to work in less than a week and do not want to get served at work either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kutuzov Posted August 8, 2013 Report Share Posted August 8, 2013 They shouldn't serve you at work, but the 30 days to respond is long gone, so yes in this case I would highly recommend a settlement. If you settle you won't have a judgement (unless it's already done), if you pay the settlement of course. Ask for a dismissal with prejudice for you to sign, they can file a voluntary dismissal even after a default has been entered in Florida. If they file or already filed a motion for Final Judgement that goes on your credit and they could potentially garnish your wages and/or freeze your bank account, so better take case of it before that happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faith316 Posted August 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 10, 2013 I am leaning toward settling with attorney because I don't believe I will qualify for legal aid by the info posted on their site. Can you think offhand of a thread here that might help me with the negotiations between myself and the atty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racecar Posted August 11, 2013 Report Share Posted August 11, 2013 Read this case she did not show up and won. IN THE COUNTY COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,IN AND FOR VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA.CASE NO. 2006-10917-CODLDIVISION: 71LVNV FUNDING LLC as Assigneeof Household Bank (SB) NA.,Plaintiff,vs.GINEVRA MOEHRLIN,Defendant. /ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FINAL JUDGMENTAND CLOSING THE COURT’S FILETHIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff’s request for Final Judgment and, after a reviewof the file and being fully advised in the premises, the court finds as follows:The court cannot grant a final judgment for damages without proof of the debt. The Plaintiff filed acomplaint for Breach of Contract, Account stated and Money Lent on May 25, 2006. The Defendant wasserved on June 2, 2006 and failed to appear at the pre-trial conference. As a result, a Default was enteredon June 30, 2006. Plaintiff now seeks a Default Final Judgment for damages. A defaulted party has theright to rely upon the court to issue a judgment against them that conforms to the evidence. However,without evidence, the court has nothing with which to base a damage judgment. The court is charged withthe responsibility to do justice. Given the effects of a judgment, the court has a mandate to enter a fairand just judgment in all cases. A court is not the forum for one party to gain an unfair advantage over theother simply because one party did not respond to a summons. The court will enter a judgment based onrelief supported by the pleadings or substantive law applicable to them. This court finds the proof ofdamages lacking in the pleadings and attachments.FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAWWith respect to the default judgment for failure to answer, the Rules of Civil Procedure providefor entry of default by either the clerk or the court. However, if it is necessary, the court may request anaccounting to enable the court to enter judgment or to effectuate it. The court may receive affidavits,make references, or conduct hearings, as it deems necessary.In Trawick’s book on Practice and Procedure, he elaborated on the effect of a default judgment:A default admits liability as claimed in the pleading by the party seekingaffirmative relief against the party in default. It operates as an admission of thetruth of the well-pleaded allegations of the pleading, except those concerningdamages [emphasis added]. It does not admit facts not pleaded, not properlypleaded or conclusions of law. Fair inferences will be made from the pleadings, butforced inferences will not. The party seeking affirmative relief may not bePage 1 of 311/19/2006granted relief that is not supported by the pleadings or by substantive lawapplicable to the pleadings [emphasis added]. A party in default may rely on theselimitations.In Samuels v King Motor Co. of Ft. Lauderdale, 782 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), the FourthDistrict Court held that to state a cause of action, a complaint must allege sufficient ultimate facts to showthat the pleader is entitled to relief. "Whether a complaint is sufficient to state a cause of action is anissue of law”.With reference to Plaintiff’s count for Breach of Contract, in order to sustain the burden of prooffor a Breach of Contract the Plaintiff must attach a copy of the contract to the complaint. Fla. Rules ofCiv. Pro. 1.130, states in part-(a) Instruments Attached.. --All bonds, notes, bills of exchange, contracts, accounts, ordocuments upon which action may be brought or defense made, or a copy thereof or acopy of the portions thereof material to the pleadings, shall be incorporated in orattached to the pleading.In the instant case, the Plaintiff failed to attach a copy of the contract or any document that wouldestablish a contractual relationship between the parties. Plaintiff failed to attach an itemized statement ofcharges or a statement. Not only did the Plaintiff fail to attach a bill, statement or contact to thecomplaint, the Plaintiff has not attached ANYTHING to its affidavit or the complaint that has theDefendant’s name or signature on it. In, Samuel v. King Motors of Ft. Lauderdale 782 So.2d 489 (Fla. 4thDCA 2001), where a complaint is based on a written instrument, the complaint does not state a cause ofaction until the instrument or an adequate portion thereof is attached to or incorporated in the complaint.Additionally, with reference to the affidavit of proof provided by the Plaintiff in support of it’sclaim for damages, the court notes that the affidavit is prepared by the Plaintiff employee. As thePlaintiff is not the original creditor, the records they keep are hearsay when the documents upon whichthe affiant relied is not admitted into evidence or attached to the complaint or affidavit. (See, Johnson v.State, 691 So.2d 43 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1997), testimony (in person or by affidavit) of a witness on a businessrecord is inadmissible hearsay if the record has not been admitted into evidence). Additionally, theFlorida Supreme court in Bolin v. State, 736 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 1999), held that the business recordsexception of the hearsay rule cannot be applied when the business record is not in evidence.Consequently, the affidavit is nothing more than inadmissible, contradictory hearsay. (Also see, Hawkinsv. State 884 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 2DCA 2004).Next, the court considers the Plaintiff’s cause of action for Account Stated. The Plaintiff mustestablish a debtor/creditor relationship with the Defendant and established a course of business dealingsbetween the parties. Additionally, it must be established that the Defendant was sent a statement and thatthe Defendant expressly or impliedly consented to the statement by failing to object. Consequently,there needs to be a copy of a statement and proof of mailing to establish a presumption of no objection.Then, the relationship between the parties and the usual course of business between them becomes aquestion of law. (See, Martyn v. Arnold, 18 So.2d 791 (Fla. 1985). For an account stated to exist, therePage 2 of 311/19/2006must be agreement between the parties that a certain balance is correct and due and an express orimplicit promise to pay this balance. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co. v Corniche Exp., 400 So.2d 1286(Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Also see, Carpenter Contractors Of America, Inc. and R & D Thiel, Inc. v.Fastener Corp. Of America, Inc., 611 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Here there was no evidence thatthe parties agreed on any balance due and owing.Finally, without any documentation of a contractual relationship or of an account, the Plaintiff hasnot proven that the Defendant was ever lent any money. Therefore, it isORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff has failed in its proof. Motion for FinalJudgment is hereby DENIED and the case dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is hereby instructed toclose the court’s file.DONE AND ORDERED in chambers at DeLand, Volusia County, Florida, this _____ day ofAugust, 2006.SHIRLEY A. GREENCounty Court JudgeCopies to:Hayt, Hayt & Landau, Attorneys for Plaintiff7765 S.W. 87 Ave., Suite 101Miami, Florida 33173Ginevra Moehrlin, Defendant790 Rasley RoadNew Smyrna Beach, FL 32168Page 3 of 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faith316 Posted August 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 12, 2013 Thank you for all the info. I read the above case with interest but it does not seem to apply to me. This defendant did not receive any proof of contract, a statement or anything else it seems attached to the paperwork she was served. I was. It seems the judge is stating that even though she missed responding within the required time frame, she cannot be penalized because she did not respond to something in which no facts were presented. I am going to call the lawyer today to settle this debt. Could I ask the lawyer to not send a 1099 tax form as part of the settlement? Also, I was going to ask for the following: in writing that the court case will be dismissed and they will not seek a final judgement with a full payment of $xxxx. In writing, that the account is paid with no further amount due/owing and that the final amount of $xxx will be paid when evidence is received that the case is dimissed. Request no 1099 form submitted. Finally, I am aiming towards a settlement of $9,800 or less with offer 30% of total balance before 10/1, 40% by 1/14 and the remainder by 4/14. Any thoughts/?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faith316 Posted August 13, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 13, 2013 Thank you for all the info. I read the above case with interest but it does not seem to apply to me. This defendant did not receive any proof of contract, a statement or anything else it seems attached to the paperwork she was served. I was. It seems the judge is stating that even though she missed responding within the required time frame, she cannot be penalized because she did not respond to something in which no facts were presented. I am going to call the lawyer today to settle this debt. Could I ask the lawyer to not send a 1099 tax form as part of the settlement? Also, I was going to ask for the following: in writing that the court case will be dismissed and they will not seek a final judgement with a full payment of $xxxx. In writing, that the account is paid with no further amount due/owing and that the final amount of $xxx will be paid when evidence is received that the case is dimissed. Request no 1099 form submitted. Finally, I am aiming towards a settlement of $9,800 or less with offer 30% of total balance before 10/1, 40% by 1/14 and the remainder by 4/14. Any thoughts/?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts