Jump to content

DV Midland Credit Management they reply asking if I had a attorney


bored7one4
 Share

Recommended Posts

So I DV Midland Credit Management last month and I got a letter in the mail stating the following.

 

In a previous communication with our company you indicated that you were being represented by an attorney but attorney contact information was not provided.  Please provide a following information so we may contact your attorney directly.

 

ATTORNEY NAME

ATTORNEY ADDRESS

ATTORNEY PHONE NUMBER.

 

I use the standard DV letter and no where on it indicated that i am represented by an attorney.

 

 

 

How should I replay?  

 

It also said If they do not hear back from me within 30 days they will assume that you are not represented by an attorney.

 

 

 

Any input will be great.

 

Thanks

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, if you kept a copy of the letter you send to Midland, please review it to make sure it did not reference that you had obtained an attorney. Some of the website copy and paste letter might make that inference.

If the letter did infer an attorney, you might want to send a letter like I put below. Otherwise you can ignore or send the letter below:

"Dear Midland,

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated --- requesting information regarding an attorney that I have hired to help me in these matters. I apologize for the confusion but at this time I have not obtained an attorney regarding these matter. I do reserve the right to obtain one in the future should I feel I need one.

Please also note that the letter dated --- is not proper validation according to the FDCPA. I therefore expect that the law applies and that no collection of this debt will proceed until such time as I receive said proper validation.

Thank You

Your Name"

If this goes to court, a letter such as this will show the judge that you took the effort to clarify things.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I received the same letter during my dealings with them.  I agree with admin that this is likely a canned response.  I sent them a letter stating that I was not yet represented by an attorney, but that I would not hesitate to contact one should I deem it necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of the letter is to look like you are being cooperative with Midland in regards to these matters. Whenever I perform an act on the basis of law, I make sure to do things in such a way that will look good to a judge that will see this. I also try to remove any ambiguity that could lead to a loophole for the other side. I would send said letter anyways and let a judge decide what the law is in regards to this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The idea of the letter is to look like you are being cooperative with Midland in regards to these matters. Whenever I perform an act on the basis of law, I make sure to do things in such a way that will look good to a judge that will see this. I also try to remove any ambiguity that could lead to a loophole for the other side. I would send said letter anyways and let a judge decide what the law is in regards to this.

@WhoCares1000 - maybe, the OP will have to decide if it's worth the price of a CMRRR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it's a "not mine" debt, then there is no information you would have.

 

"If no one has info on this debt, then it does not exist.  I know I have no info on it.  Let's see what YOU have.  If you have nothing, then it does not exist."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say it is just another attempt to avoid the dv process. These ca's are always looking for an angle to avoid the fdcpa.

 

Here is what I would do. Send them a refusal to pay letter. Makae it short and sweet, the less you say the less they can attempt to use your words against you.

 

Acct NO.

To whom it may concern:

I refuse to pay any portion of the alleged debt, nor will I pay it in full.

 

If this forces them to sue you, you have proof you tried to cooperate but they would not provide you with enough information for you to determine if this is a valid debt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So the only things left on my credit report are couple of charged off accounts  BofA, Chase, Citi and Asset Acceptance account.  I've been disputing with all 3 credit bureau but only Trans union deleted the Asset Acceptance account.  All other came back as verified with this 2nd round of disputes.  Should I DV Asset Acceptance ?  I did not get a notice from them. (maybe I did a long time ago) or should I continue to disputes the accounts via the 3 credit bureau?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the only things left on my credit report are couple of charged off accounts  BofA, Chase, Citi and Asset Acceptance account.  I've been disputing with all 3 credit bureau but only Trans union deleted the Asset Acceptance account.  All other came back as verified with this 2nd round of disputes.  Should I DV Asset Acceptance ?  I did not get a notice from them. (maybe I did a long time ago) or should I continue to disputes the accounts via the 3 credit bureau?

@bored7one4 - I would do both.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.