jmkglloyd Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Hey eveyone! What's the concesus out there when a complaint includes breach of contract....does the Plaintiff need to produce that contract to validate that complaint? In AZ, I tried to look for this in the Rules of Evidence but I found nothing. There may be something in the ARS that I'll look at in a bit. Will also look for case law. Thoughts..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Seaward Posted January 21, 2014 Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 They have to demonstrate that a contract existed. Having said that, verbal contracts are valid and subject to breach of contract action. If they can show you took money on the promise to repay it, they have a valid claim. (The evidence of the promise on a debt is your payments on the account.) There is no requirement for a signed contract to establish that an agreement existed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmkglloyd Posted January 21, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2014 Great thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.