Scarytime Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 1. Who is the named plaintiff in the suit? American Express Centurion Bank2. What is the name of the law firm handling the suit? (should be listed at the top of the complaint.) Law Offices of Michael and Associates3. How much are you being sued for? $46004. Who is the original creditor? (if not the Plaintiff) Plaintiff5. How do you know you are being sued? (You were served, right?) Yes6. How were you served? (Mail, In person, Notice on door) In Person7. Was the service legal as required by your state? YesProcess Service Requirements by State - Summons Complaint8. What was your correspondence (if any) with the people suing you before you think you were being sued? None9. What state and county do you live in? Los Angeles, CA10. When is the last time you paid on this account? (looking to establish if you are outside of the statute of limitations) 2012 (will double check the month)11. What is the SOL on the debt? To find out: 4 yearsStatute of Limitations on Debts12. What is the status of your case? Suit served? Motions filed? You can find this by a) calling the court or looking it up online (many states have this information posted - when you find the online court site, search by case number or your name). Trial set for 2/2015, this was done after I filed the denial13. Have you disputed the debt with the credit bureaus (both the original creditor and the collection agency?) No.14. Did you request debt validation before the suit was filed? Note: if you haven't sent a debt validation request, don't bother doing this now - it's too late. No15. How long do you have to respond to the suit? (This should be in your paperwork). If you don't respond to the lawsuit notice you will lose automatically. In 99% of the cases, they will require you to answer the summons, and each point they are claiming. 30 days, already responded We need to know what the "charges" are. Please post what they are claiming.Breach of ContractCommon Counts: Account Stated and Book AccountQuantum Meruit Reasonable ValueDid you receive an interrogatory (questionnaire) regarding the lawsuit? NoHere is an example of what the summons/complaint may look like: Sued by a Debt Collector - Learn How to Fight Debt Lawsuits16. What evidence did they send with the summons? An affidavit? Statements from the OC? Contract? List anything else they attached as exhibits. Agreement (unsigned) with last statement from AMEX. Sent the discovery and they sent me all the statements from 2008-2013 Received summons at my home Dec 22nd. Filed a denial at the court house and was immediately given a court date for next year (2015). Sent in my request for production of documents and yesterday I received a very heavy package with my statements from 2007-2013. How do I proceed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotWheels96 Posted January 30, 2014 Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Oh how I love when these plaintiffs use breach of contract right along with account stated! Gets even better with quantum meruit!I'd get a BoP sent as soon as you're able. How many requests were made in your discovery request? How many items did you ask for? Did you also send interrogatories? RFA's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted January 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 This is what I sent them. I have not sent interrogatories or RFA's To PLAINTIFF American Express Centurion Bank, a Utah state chartered bank and [its/their] attorneys of record herein:DEMAND IS HEREBY MADE UPON YOU, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 454, to furnish to Defendant XXXX, an Individual, within 10 days, a Bill of Particulars setting forth all items and details of the account on which the cause of action for [goods sold and delivered] [money had and received] [money lent or paid] [quantum meruit] of plaintiff’s complaint is based, including the date of each transaction, a description of the services, materials or goods supplied or other considerations rendered, the price or charge made for each item, and all payments or credits that have been made to the account. [Add anything else relevant i.e. contract assigning the account to plaintiff] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted January 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 30, 2014 Ooops I'm sorry I have sent the BOP already and they responded with a big package full of statements from 2007-2013. Do I need to send anything else after this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 I received Interrogatories from the Plaintiff and I'm not sure how to answer. Your assistance is highly appreciated State in detail the facts upon which you base your claims that the PERSON asking this interrogatory is responsible for your damages State in detail the fact upon which you base your contention that you are not responsible, in whole, part, for plaintiff damages. State the name, ADDRESS and the telephone number of each person, other than the PERSON asking this interrogatory, who is responsible, in whole, part, for damages claimed in this action Identify all documents that are part of the agreement for each state the name, address and telephone number of the person who has each document State each part of the agreement not in writing, the name, ADDRESS and telephone number of each person agreeing to that provision, and the date that part of the agreement was made Identify all documents that evidence each part of the agreement, and for each state the name, address, and telephone number of the person who has each document Identify all documents that are part of each modification of the agreement not in writing and for each state the name address, and telephone number of the person who has each document State each modification not in writing, the date, and the name, address and telephone number of the person agreeing to the modification, and the date the modification was made Identify all documents that evidence each modification of the agreement not in writing and for each state the name, address and telephone number of the person who has each document Describe and give the date of every act or omission that you claim is a breach of the agreement Identify each agreement excused and state why performance was excused. Identify each agreement terminated by mutual consent and state why it was terminated, including dates Identify each unenforceable agreement and state the facts upon which your answer is based Identify each ambiguous agreement and state the facts upon which your answer is based Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spikey Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 Those are some strange interrogs, they're almost all vague and ambiguous or not related to the case. I would likely object to most of these. The ones asking for documents can be answered that you don't have the requested documents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 Thanks @Spikey I will work on creating my answers and post for review before I send Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spikey Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 @Scarytime Just make sure if you object, you state a reason. Like: Objection, interrogatory is vague, ambiguous and not likely to lead to admissible evidence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 @Spikey thanks, I'm so confused and have been scouring the website to see similar interrogatories but I can't find any. I will work on the answers. I really appreciate you help Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credator Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 Discovery done well is both art and science IMHO. It is a bit intimidating to me. I would look to the rules for how to answer rogs (not sure if this is the latest): http://law.justia.com/codes/california/2010/ccp/2030.210-2030.310.html. They do seem to be strange rogs. I would be looking at answering many of the "identify" requests with something along the lines of not being aware of or in possession of any such agreement/modification/etc. A direct answer, when available, would always seem preferable to an objections AFAIK. This site seems to have some useful information on rogs: http://california-discovery-law.com/interrogatories.htm#FORM_of_answers I received Interrogatories from the Plaintiff and I'm not sure how to answer. Your assistance is highly appreciated State in detail the facts upon which you base your claims that the PERSON asking this interrogatory is responsible for your damages...Without having filed a counterclaim request #1 seems irrelevant and nonsensical. They really want to know how they damaged me? Of course I would want to timely hit opposing with rogs, admissions, and production requests. I find they really appreciate the effort. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credator Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 OK, the "strangeness" is explained. They appear to be form interrogatories: http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/disc004.pdfSections 115 and 150 seems to be relevant. I have never used "form" (uniform?) interrogatories or been served them.They perhaps have some advantages over non-uniform interrogatories and I would probably want to learn the differences before propounding my discovery as I presume I may have a choice in which I use. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 13, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 @Credator, Thank you. I will start reading on the differences and hopefully grasp it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotWheels96 Posted February 13, 2014 Report Share Posted February 13, 2014 I read the ROGS and immediately recognized them as form ROGS. Glad I make sure I read through each post before jumping to reply so I don't make the mistake of parroting information! My friend received them which is why I recognize them, and to me, some of them make no sense. The first one for example, seems as though it would only be appropriate if a counter claim existed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Ok so here goes...Let me know if the answers are sufficient to proceed InterrogatoriesState the name, address, telephone # and relationship to you of each person who prepared or assisted in the preparation of the responses to these interrogatoriesANSWER: I HAD NO ASSISTANCE IN PREPARING OF THE RESPONSES TO THESE INTERROGATORIES.State your Name, any other names by which you have been known, and your addressANSWER: ScarytimeState each residence address for the last 5 years and the dates you lives at each addressANSWER: ADDRESS, I OBJECT TO THE REMAINDER OF THE INTERROGATORY AS BEING IRRELEVANT AND INVASIVE OF MY PRIVACYState the name, address and telephone number of each employer you have had in the past five years and the dates you worked for eachANSWER: I OBJECT TO ANSWERING THIS INTERROGATORY AS BEING IRRELEVANT AND INVASIVE OF MY PRIVACY.State you current business name and address, type of business entity and your titleANSWER: I OBJECT TO ANSWERING THIS INTERROGATORY AS BEING IRRELEVANT AND INVASIVE OF MY PRIVACYState in detail the facts upon which you base your claims that the PERSON asking this interrogatory is responsible for your damages ANSWER:I OBJECT TO ANSWERING THIS INTERROGATORY IT IS IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE AT HAND. State in detail the fact upon which you base your contention that you are not responsible, in whole, part, for plaintiff damages. ANSWER: PLAINTIFF HAD THE OBLIGATION TO PROVE THAT I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR NAY ALLEGED DAMAGES THEY MIGHT HAVE SUSTAINED THAT WERE CAUSED BY ME. I CANNOT PROVE A NEGATIVE STATEMENT. State the name, ADDRESS and the telephone number of each person, other than the PERSON asking this interrogatory, who is responsible, in whole, part, for damages claimed in this action ANSWER: THE INFORMATION REQUESTED IS NOT IN MY POSSESION Identify all documents that are part of the agreement for each state the name, address and telephone number of the person who has each document ANSWER: DEFENDANT HAS NO AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFF; DEFENDANT HAS NO DOCUMENT. State each part of the agreement not in writing, the name, ADDRESS and telephone number of each person agreeing to that provision, and the date that part of the agreement was made ANSWER: DEFENDANT HAS NO AGREEMENT WITH THE PALINTIFF. N/A Identify all documents that evidence each part of the agreement, and for each state the name, address, and telephone number of the person who has each document ANSWER: DEFENDANT HAS NO AGREEMENT WITH PLAINTIFF; DEFENDANT HAS NO DOCUMENT. Identify all documents that are part of each modification of the agreement not in writing and for each state the name address, and telephone number of the person who has each document ANSWER: N/A State each modification not in writing, the date, and the name, address and telephone number of the person agreeing to the modification, and the date the modification was made ANSWER: N/A Identify all documents that evidence each modification of the agreement not in writing and for each state the name, address and telephone number of the person who has each document ANSWER: N/ADescribe and give the date of every act or omission that you claim is a breach of the agreement ANSWER: N/AIdentify each agreement excused and state why performance was excused.ANSWER: N/A Identify each agreement terminated by mutual consent and state why it was terminated, including datesANSWER: N/AIdentify each unenforceable agreement and state the facts upon which your answer is based ANSWER: N/AIdentify each ambiguous agreement and state the facts upon which your answer is basedI did not apply, charge, or paid for THE CREDIT ACCOUNT.I have never agreed to the terms and conditions, by contract or by implication, of THE CREDIT ACCOUNT. I have never entered any contract or agreement, by written agreement or by implication, with Plaintiff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Also, here are my answers to the Request for admissions ...my head is spinning Request for admissions Admit that you entered into a written contract with Plaintiff wherein you were issued a card for the purposes of obtaining goods and/or services a/or cash advances from businesses that honor the card DENYAdmit that within the last 4 year, you utilized your card for the purposes of obtaining goods and/or services and/or cash advances from businesses that honor the cardDENY Admit that within the last 4 years, you failed to make the minimum payments on your cardDENY Admit that you received your card statement on a monthly basis at the address xxxxxxx DENY Admit that the attached and marked exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the card statement that was mailed to you at address xxxxxObjection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the account Admit that you received the agreement between the card member and Amex dated xxxx 2009 attached hereto as exhibit BObjection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the accountAdmit that you agreed to the terms and conditions set forth on exhibit B Objection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the account Admit that you received the cardmember agreement dated Dec 3 attached heretoObjection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the account Admit that you agreed to the updated terms and conditions set for the in exhibit C (card member agreement) when you used you cardObjection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the account Admit you owe the plaintiff the principal amount of xxxx as a result of the usage of the card account ending in xxxxxxxxObjection. Defendant has denied knowledge of the account Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spikey Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 I suggest with the admissions where you object, tack on "therefore deny" at the end of them. That protects you in case they try to claim that your objections are unfounded and try to get them ruled admitted by the court. Otherwise the admissions look fine. ANSWER: I OBJECT TO ANSWERING THIS INTERROGATORY AS BEING IRRELEVANT AND INVASIVE OF MY PRIVACY You could add that to these answers that the interrogatory is not likely lead to admissible evidence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Amos Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 If it were mine I would just remove the word "objection" and replace it with "DENY" that way there is no confusion and no possibility of motioning to get them admitted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anon Amos Posted February 14, 2014 Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 ...my head is spinning Remember you have 30 days to respond (not sure when you received this). Don't send them early, and use CMRRR or they will say they never got your response. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted February 14, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 14, 2014 Thank you @Spikey and @Anon Amos ... I still have time to respond to them because they say I have 35 days and I received them 2/8/14 and they were mailed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted December 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 I'm back again..They have sent me a demand for expert trial witness information and demand for production of expert reports and writings. Along with that they also sent PLAINTIFF EXPERT WITNESS DECLATION and NOTICE TO APPEAR AT TRIAL So my understaing is they will not be calling a witness to appear for the Plaintiff (AMEX) but if I have a witness I should let them know. Is this correct? I have no witness, what do I need to send to them? I appreciate all the help! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadinca Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 so what you have is a ccp96 request from plaintiff. since you will not be taking any witness to trial, you can either not respond or respond saying that documents and witness will be used for impeachment only. the "PLAINTIFF EXPERT WITNESS DECLATION" I think is their CCP 98. remember to object to the declaration and subpoena the witness. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarytime Posted December 11, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 Thank you @sadinca Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadinca Posted December 11, 2014 Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 experts in these forums recommend you send a reply to their request stating that documents and witness will be used for impeachment only because it send a message that you will put up a fight in court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelpingGreg Posted December 11, 2014 Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 experts in these forums recommend you send a reply to their request stating that documents and witness will be used for impeachment only because it send a message that you will put up a fight in court.Experts in these forums recommend you send a reply to their request stating that documents and witness will be used for impeachment. [PERIOD]BEST ADVICE:FOLLOW EXPERTS IN THESE FORUMS' RECOMMENDATIONS & DO NOT USE THIS TIME IN YOUR LIFE TO GET CREATIVE, OR TRY RECREATING THE WHEEL, as it were.OUR COMMON GOAL:THE VERY BEST OUTCOME POSSIBLE IN EACH CASE.___NOT___ AN AWARD FOR TRYING THE NEW & DIFFERENT.Let's save that for the victory party buffet sampling! Yes?Warmly, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
string Posted December 11, 2014 Report Share Posted December 11, 2014 I'm back again..They have sent me a demand for expert trial witness information and demand for production of expert reports and writings. Along with that they also sent PLAINTIFF EXPERT WITNESS DECLATION Really? They want expert witness info? As in ccp2034.210, et. seq? I haven't seen this here before, but I think you'll have to provide a statement by the date in the demand: <<2034.260. (a) All parties who have appeared in the action shallexchange information concerning expert witnesses in writing on orbefore the date of exchange specified in the demand. The exchange ofinformation may occur at a meeting of the attorneys for the partiesinvolved or by a mailing on or before the date of exchange. ( b ) The exchange of expert witness information shall includeeither of the following: (1) A list setting forth the name and address of any person whoseexpert opinion that party expects to offer in evidence at the trial. (2) A statement that the party does not presently intend to offerthe testimony of any expert witness.>> Curious about the contents of their "expert information" .... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.