pierce

Sued By Midland, denied Arbitration?

57 posts in this topic

1 hour ago, pierce said:

You would have to be so clearly uninformed to take such a stance against the supreme court.

The coup de grâce (my personal favorite). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Brotherskeeper said:

:cheerleader:

:bedjump:

@fisthardcheese stresses this SCOTUS ruling all the time. 

 

Um...it didn't happen: 

Judgment: Ninth Circuit Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on April 27, 2011. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan.

My mistake it was Webber vs senergy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So did the judge deny their summary judgement, or did he just not rule on it and stayed the case instead pending arbitration?

Great job on the phone hearing!! You did exactly what you were supposed to do!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, fisthardcheese said:

So did the judge deny their summary judgement, or did he just not rule on it and stayed the case instead pending arbitration?

Great job on the phone hearing!! You did exactly what you were supposed to do!

Yes. Judge went straight to granting the mtc to arb. He stayed the case pending on arbitration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now