Midland Funding Lawsuit...

[Stubis 1]

Thank you for these responses. I sincerely appreciate it. 

 

[Stubis 1]

The Judge issued a tentative ruling today that I do not understand. 

I had submitted a Motion To Continue Trial so that we could have the Hearing for the MTC Arbitration before the Trial date. Today the Judge denied the Motion To Continue Trial because "the Defendant failed to file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities or a declaration in support as required by CRC 3.1112". 

 Then, the Tentative Ruling continues with: 

"However, on the Court's own motion, the Trial Date currently set for October, is hereby continued to (a date in December).  Moving party's attorney is to submit a formal order that sets out verbatim the tentative ruling herein and complies with California Rule of Court 3.1312, and is thereafter to prepare, file and serve notice of order". 

So, it appears that the Judge is allowing me to have the hearing for the MTCA prior to the Trial date...???

 

[Dgree 4]

On 10/16/2019 at 7:44 PM, Stubis said:

The Judge issued a tentative ruling today that I do not understand. 

I had submitted a Motion To Continue Trial so that we could have the Hearing for the MTC Arbitration before the Trial date. Today the Judge denied the Motion To Continue Trial because "the Defendant failed to file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities or a declaration in support as required by CRC 3.1112". 

 Then, the Tentative Ruling continues with: 

"However, on the Court's own motion, the Trial Date currently set for October, is hereby continued to (a date in December).  Moving party's attorney is to submit a formal order that sets out verbatim the tentative ruling herein and complies with California Rule of Court 3.1312, and is thereafter to prepare, file and serve notice of order". 

So, it appears that the Judge is allowing me to have the hearing for the MTCA prior to the Trial date...???

 

Sounds like the Judge is denying YOUR motion but is submitting THEIR motion to move the trail date. It is saying that you must formally serve this specific order to the plaintiff in accordance with CRC 3.1312.

As to your MTCA...

This would seem to mean that you now have time to submit a MTCA. All motions must be submitted and SERVED 16 COURT DAYS prior to the motion hearing date. Add 5 CALENDAR days if you are serving the motion via post office first class mail. Add 2 CALENDAR days if serving with overnight mail. 

The MTCA must included a Memorandum of Points & Authorities. If not, it will be denied just the same. 

 

[fisthardcheese 1,369]

Is there a hearing date set for the MTC?  If not, I don't understand moving the trial date.

[Stubis 1]

Yes. I have asked for the hearing for the MTCA to be on the 1st November. 

 

[Stubis 1]

"The MTCA must included a Memorandum of Points & Authorities. If not, it will be denied just the same." 

In my MTCA I cited a number of specific legal cases related to Arbitration.

 

[Dgree 4]

On 10/22/2019 at 7:23 PM, Stubis said:

"The MTCA must included a Memorandum of Points & Authorities. If not, it will be denied just the same." 

In my MTCA I cited a number of specific legal cases related to Arbitration.

 

Your MTCA must be a separate document that is filed along with your MoPA. Although you can cite cases on your MTCA, the MoPA is the place were you lay out your argument for the judge. 
 

So you need to separate documents:

1 MTCA - this must be on pleading paper. The hearing information must be included on the cover sheet along with the Reservation ID (if set using the online Court Reservation System). On this document you set forth your high level argument as to why you are seeking to compel arbitration. There are plenty of examples of this on the web. On this document, you must also attach the confirmation of the hearing that was produced from the CRS, at the end of the document.

2. Memorandum of Points and Authorities - this is a separate document that must also be on pleading paper and include a cover sheet with the case information. You can title this like “Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Compel Contractual Arbitration and Stay Proceedings pending Arbitration”

Then you write your argument in 3 distinct sections. Intro, Argument (Referencing case law from federal and/or CA courts ONLY), and conclusion. 
 

Submit both at the same time and make sure you serve the Plantiff.

[Stubis 1]

Thank you.

Have prepared both sets of documents for filing and mailing this afternoon.

 

 

[fisthardcheese 1,369]

On 10/22/2019 at 10:09 PM, Stubis said:

Yes. I have asked for the hearing for the MTCA to be on the 1st November. 

 

[Edit] nevermind, I see that you are working on resubmitting your MTC with the proper format.

[Stubis 1]

This is such a frustrating process. The judge denied my MTCA "without prejudice" because I filed it after the deadline. 

So now I start the entire process all over again...

 

[RyanEX 886]

1 hour ago, Stubis said:

 

This is such a frustrating process. The judge denied my MTCA "without prejudice" because I filed it after the deadline. 

So now I start the entire process all over again...

Sorry to hear that. On the bright side, the code/deadlines will work to your advantage in this process. If the judge is a stickler for the code, then he/she should be a stickler against the plaintiff too.

[Dgree 4]

2 hours ago, Stubis said:

This is such a frustrating process. The judge denied my MTCA "without prejudice" because I filed it after the deadline. 

So now I start the entire process all over again...

 

What deadline? The rules of the court say that all motions must be filed and served 16 courts days before the hearing. Did you miss that deadline?

[Stubis 1]

Yes. I missed the deadline by a week, mainly because of the PG&E blackouts in Northern California. 

And yes, the Judge is a stickler for the rules, and that should eventually work in my favor. 

Funny thing...I have been to the Courthouse so many times now that I know the Clerks by their first names, and they know me. They have been extremely helpful on this journey.

  

[Stubis 1]

Finally...! After 6 months. The ruling from today's Hearing.
Defendant�s unopposed Motion to Compel Arbitration is granted.

In deciding a petition to compel arbitration, trial courts must decide first whether an enforceable arbitration agreement exists between the parties, and then determine the second gateway issue whether the claims are covered within the scope of the agreement. Omar v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2004) 118 Cal.App.4th 955, 961.

Here, it appears that an arbitration agreement exists and that the claims are covered within the scope of such agreement. Defendant has asserted his right to arbitration and has provided this court with a declaration in support which attaches the arbitration agreement at issue.

Thus, the motion is granted. This case is stayed pending arbitration. The currently set trial date is vacated. A case management conference is set for ............ at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. ... for status of arbitration.

Moving party is to submit a formal order that sets out verbatim the tentative ruling herein and complies with California Rule of Court 3.1312, and is thereafter to prepare, file and serve notice of order.

I want to thank everyone for their help and advice.

Now, on to Arbitration...!!

 

[LaneBlane 63]

3 hours ago, Stubis said:

Thus, the motion is granted. This case is stayed pending arbitration. The currently set trial date is vacated. A case management conference is set for ............ at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. ... for status of arbitration.

Even though you ran into a few bumps along the way, you didn't let it discourage you. 

Congratulations!