Jump to content

Being sued in michigan


Phil smith
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi, I need some help here. I just received a summons from absolute resolutions investments llc  they are suing me for 3800 and court costs. I moved to Michigan a little over a year ago and have been struggling to keep up with my bills ever since. I cannot afford to pay them and keep going to work as I have to make vehicle payments and maintain them along with feeding my family. Now I need a lawyer?!? I cannot afford one of those either. How do I go about fixing this without going bankrupt? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Phil smith said:

Hi, I need some help here. I just received a summons from absolute resolutions investments llc  they are suing me for 3800 and court costs. I moved to Michigan a little over a year ago and have been struggling to keep up with my bills ever since. I cannot afford to pay them and keep going to work as I have to make vehicle payments and maintain them along with feeding my family. Now I need a lawyer?!? I cannot afford one of those either. How do I go about fixing this without going bankrupt? 

Welcome to the boards. We need more information.  Please copy and answer the questions in the link.  Thank you.

https://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/242744-qs-to-answer-when-posting-in-this-forum-please-read/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was sent these questions to answer. i hope they help. thanks for looking

named plaintiff: absolute resolutions investmensts llc

name of law firm: stenger & stenger pc

amount: 3858.46 plus court costs

original creditor:first national bank of omaha

how do i know? i was served today in person

i dont know if it was legal according m\to my state laws...

i live in osceola county, mi 

last time i paid was in 2016 early 2017

open card account on oct 3rd, 2014

nothing in the court records as yet

i havent disputed the debt at all....i didnt know that was a thing

i didnt request a debt validation

i have 21 days to respond to the suit

they didnt send anything (evidence) with the paperwork i got today

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@fisthardcheese 

I pulled up a First National Bank of Omaha agreement from CFPB archive Q1-2017 that has this clause:

'“Ordinary Claims” are not subject to this arbitration provision and may be resolved through litigation.  A Claim will be considered an “Ordinary Claim” if all three of the following are true: (1) the only remedy being sought for the Claim is monetary damages; (2) the recovery being sought for the Claim is less than $25,000, excluding interest and costs; and (3) the only parties to litigation to resolve the Claim will be you, us and/or Related Parties.'

Any suggestions on getting aound this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Brotherskeeper said:

@fisthardcheese 

I pulled up a First National Bank of Omaha agreement from CFPB archive Q1-2017 that has this clause:

'“Ordinary Claims” are not subject to this arbitration provision and may be resolved through litigation.  A Claim will be considered an “Ordinary Claim” if all three of the following are true: (1) the only remedy being sought for the Claim is monetary damages; (2) the recovery being sought for the Claim is less than $25,000, excluding interest and costs; and (3) the only parties to litigation to resolve the Claim will be you, us and/or Related Parties.'

Any suggestions on getting aound this?

I do not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Brotherskeeper said:

@fisthardcheese 

I pulled up a First National Bank of Omaha agreement from CFPB archive Q1-2017 that has this clause:

'“Ordinary Claims” are not subject to this arbitration provision and may be resolved through litigation.  A Claim will be considered an “Ordinary Claim” if all three of the following are true: (1) the only remedy being sought for the Claim is monetary damages; (2) the recovery being sought for the Claim is less than $25,000, excluding interest and costs; and (3) the only parties to litigation to resolve the Claim will be you, us and/or Related Parties.'

Any suggestions on getting aound this?

In the past, I have suggested filling out the AAA or JAMS demand form and in addition to claims for usual violations and asking for statutory damages, also ask for an injunction order that the erroneous account (either due to not owing, or having other errors) be removed from credit reports and that the JDB stop reporting on it.  Asking for an injunction as part of counter claims satisfies the "only remedy being sought is monetary damages" and eliminates the silly "ordinary claims" exception.

I would use the filled out demand form asking for an injunction among my other claims as proof that my claims are not precluded by the "ordinary claims" exception, but I would not bring it up at all unless the other side does first and I need to present my evidence to refute their argument.  Otherwise, I would file and go through the MTC hearing as usual.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.