Sign in to follow this  
Noreturn

Responding to JDB's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Recommended Posts

After both parties presented their case, the trial court ordered closing arguments be submitted in writing.

Plaintiff filed their Closing Argument WITH Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

Is it proper to respond to Plaintiffs facts and conclusions? Is it proper to object to fabrications?

Is it proper to file proposed findings and conclusions without being ordered by the court?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Noreturn said:
 
 

After both parties presented their case, the trial court ordered closing arguments be submitted in writing.

Plaintiff filed their Closing Argument WITH Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

Is it proper to respond to Plaintiffs facts and conclusions? Is it proper to object to fabrications?

Is it proper to file proposed findings and conclusions without being ordered by the court?

 

The answer to all the questions is yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BackFromTheDebt said:

The answer to all the questions is yes

Thanks, I couldn't find anything in our rules of civil procedure. Hopefully i can find some good reference material....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this