Jump to content

Being sued by crown asset mgmt in georgia


Recommended Posts

Ive already filed a reply.  I know reading several threads people say to invoke right for arbitration.  The debt is from a first national bank of omaha credit card.  If i read the agreement (could only find most recent though the card was probably opened 2018-2019) it looks like the arbitration agreement is that parties split the cost so i dont see that being beneficial.

Any good tips for georgia magistrate court to go pro se?

 

The law firm is ragan&ragan

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, atlsrt44 said:

Any good tips for georgia magistrate court to go pro se?

Magistrate Court is trial by ambush.  You cannot file motions in advance.  If you are going to try the arbitration route you need 3 copies of the motion with you on the date trial is set for.  You will be approached outside the court room (or sent there by the Magistrate) to try and settle it.  That is when you tell the opposing counsel you want arbitration.  If they agree you go before the Magistrate and stipulate to it and they sign the order and set a continuance.  They will not dismiss pending arb.  If they oppose you will have to argue why the motion will be granted with supporting GA case law.  If the motion is denied it will proceed to trial right then.  You will have to have a defense as a back up plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2022 at 4:42 AM, atlsrt44 said:

So i need to have 3 copies of the master agreement and a typed up motion?

You need the last active card agreement that applies to the card you have.  NOT a generic master agreement.  You would need one copy for each copy of the motion.  

1 hour ago, atlsrt44 said:

Well the good news is when i filed my reply the lady told me they are very backed up and its going to be awhile.

What county is this in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

It should be defined elsewhere in the contract for example: 

A claim will be considered an "Ordinary Claim" if all three of the following are true: (1) the only remedy being sought for the claim is monetary damages; (2) the recovery being sought for the claim is less than $25,000, excluding interest and costs; and (3) the only parties to litigation to resolve the claim will be you, and Bank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found it.  

 

“Ordinary Claim”means a Claim that meets(1)or(2)or both below.

(1) A Claim where all of the following are met:

(a) The only remedy sought for the Claim is monetary damages;

(b)The recovery sought for the Claim is less than $25,000 excluding interest and costs;and

(c) The only parties to any action to resolve the Claim will be you,us and/or Our Related Parties.

(2) Any individual Claim filed in small claims court within its jurisdiction,as long as the Claim remains in that court.

 

So if im reading this right I cant do arbitration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, atlsrt44 said:

So ive got all my documentation set.  Only question I have is in the credit card agreement it says "ordinary claims are not subject to this provision.  Ordinary claims may be resolved through court action.  

 

I cant find what an ordinary claim is.

It appears to be a small claims exclusion.  You could go ahead and MTC arbitration and hope the plaintiff misses that exclusion.  However, if they catch it, in my opinion, your only argument would be the word “may”.  (“Ordinary claims may be resolved through court action.”)

”May” is permissive.  For instance, if I say “I may go to the store today”, it means I might go to the store, but I might not go to the store.  It’s not definite.  It offers a choice.

Why did they not use the word “shall” or “will”.  Those words are definite.  There’s no “might” about it.  “I shall go to the store” means I absolutely will go.

I don’t know why they used the word “may” if they truly meant for small claims to be excluded from arbitration.  But, it would be a thin argument.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, atlsrt44 said:

credit card agreement it says "ordinary claims are not subject to this provision. 

It appears for ordinary claims arbitration clause does not apply, 

Who is the law firm? Lately twice before attorneys have not shown up and cases were dismissed with prejudice. 

So Show Up they may not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.